ËÈÒÅÐÀÒÓÐÀ

]. Austin G. À., Â ã u n å ã J. S. and Seymour R.V. Fixed-choice strategies in concept attainment. A merican Psychologist, ]953, 8, 3]4.

2. Â à ã ]] å ]] F. Ñ. Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, Eng.:, Cambridge University Press, ]932, 2 ^nd , ]968.

3. Â r u n å ã J. S., M i ]] å ã G. A. and ZimmermanC. Discriminative skill and discriminative matching in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, ]955, 49, ]87—]92.

4. G î î d n î w J. J., Â rune ã J. S., Matter J. and Potter M. C. Concept determination and concept attainment. Unpublished paper.

==209

5. Í î v ] a n d Ñ. I. A “communication analysis” of concept learning. Psychological Review, ]952, 59, 46]—472.

6. Í u ]] Ñ. L. Quantitative aspects of the evolution of concepts. Psychological Monographs, ]920, 28(]).

7-K.rechevsky I. “Hypotheses” versus “chance” in tue presolution period in sensory discrimination learning”. University of California Publications in Psychology, ]932, 6, 27—44.

8. M i ]] e r G. A. and Selfridge J. Verbal context and the recall of ineaBingful material. American Journal of Psychology, ]950, 63, ]76-^lS?.

9. Postman L. and Bruner J. S. Perception under stress. Psychological Review, ]948, 55, 3]4—323.

Ê îãëàâëåíèþ

==210

1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19-20-21-22-23-24-25-26-27-28-29-30-31-32-33-34-35-36-37-38-39-40-41-42-43-44-45-46-47-48-49-50-51-52-53-54-55-56-57-58-59-60-61-62-63-64-65-66-67-68-69-70-71-72-73-74-75-76-77-78-